The provisions in the SIAC Rules for emergency arbitration do not violate Indian laws (Delhi High Court)

     Update by Editor

­Future Retail Limited v. Amazon.Com Investment Holdings LLC and others Court: Delhi High Court| Case number: CS (Comm) 493 of 2020 | Citation: 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1636 |Bench: Mukta Gupta J | Date: 21 December 2020 | Final or interim decision: Interim Appellate proceedings: Appeal filed by Amazon pending

Continue reading
Categories: Anti-arbitration injunction  |  Balance of convenience |  Conditions for grant of interim injunction |  Control |  Emergency arbitration  |  Emergency Award |  Interim injunction |  Interim measures |  Interim relief  |  Irreparable loss |  Multi-brand retail |  Prima facie case |  Schedule I |  Section 9 CPC |  SIAC Rules |  Tortious interference |  Ubi jus ibi remedium  

Court can grant relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 even if the document containing the arbitration agreement is insufficiently stamped (Bombay High Court) [Note: the issue is pending in the Supreme Court in another matter]

     Updates by Editor

IREP Credit Capital Pvt. Ltd.  v. Tapaswi Mercantile Pvt. Ltd. and another; 2019 SCC OnLine Bom 5719 Bombay High Court; Single-judge bench, Bombay High Court, G.S. Patel, J.; decided on 20 December 2019   Can a court grant relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“ACA”)

Continue reading
Categories: Action for foreclosure |  Arbitrability of disputes  |  Arbitrable dispute |  Arbitration agreement  |  Decision of coordinate bench |  Interim measures |  Interim relief  |  Judicial discipline |  Mortgage |  Stamp duty |  Stamping of arbitration agreement |  The Garware principle