Category: Special act v. general act

Power under Articles 226/227of the Constitution must be exercised in an arbitration case with exceptional rarity, where one party is left remediless, or a clear bad faith is shown by one of the parties. (Supreme Court)

     Update by Editor , assisted by Garima Mittal

Bhaven Construction v. Executive Engineer, Sardar Sarovar Nigam Limited and Another Court: Supreme Court of India | Case Number: Civil Appeal No. 14665 of 2015 | Citation: 2021 SCC OnLine SC 8 | Bench: NV Ramana, Surya Kant, Hrishikesh Roy JJ | Date of decision: 6 January 2021   Bhaven

 Continue reading
Categories: Appointment of arbitrator |  Article 226 |  Article 227 |  Competence Competence |  Patent lack of inherent jurisdiction |  Perversity |  Power of superintendence over all courts by the High Court |  Section 16 |  Section 17 |  Section 37 |  Section 9 |  Self-contained code |  Special act v. general act |  Speedy disposal |  Test of perversity |  Time limit  

High Courts can exercise jurisdiction under Article 227 in certain arbitral matters, but with extreme circumspection, considering the statutory policy of the ACA, so that interference is restricted to orders that are passed which are patently lacking in inherent jurisdiction (Supreme Court)

     Updates by Editor

Deep Industries Limited v. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation and another, 2019 SCC OnLine SC 1602 Supreme Court, 3-judge bench, Rohinton Fali Nariman, Aniruddha Bose and V. Ramasubramanian, JJ; decided on 28 November 2019 Article 227 of the Constitution of India gives the High Court the power of superintendence over

 Continue reading
Categories: Appealable orders |  Article 226 |  Article 227 |  Competence of arbitral tribunal to rule on its own jurisdiction |  Interim measures ordered by arbitral tribunal |  Judicial review in arbitration |  Power of superintendence over all courts by the High Court |  Self-contained code |  Special act v. general act |  Speedy disposal |  Time limit