07 December 2021 | Daimler Financial Services India Private Limited v. Rajasree Motors Private Limited | Arb. OP (Com. Div.) No. 226 of 2021 | Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy J | Madras High Court
The court was considering a “suite of agreements” related to the loan facility given by the petitioner to the respondent. One agreement had an arbitration clause; the others did not.
Arbitration could proceed under all the agreements if either the arbitration clause one document was incorporated by reference into the others or by applying any of the legal bases available to bind non-signatories to arbitration.
In the court’s prima facie opinion, all agreements related to extending loan facilities, and it was “inappropriate” to decide in a Section 11 petition if the arbitration clauses were incorporated by reference or if the circumstances nevertheless justify drawing non-signatories into the arbitration.
Read the decision here.
Categories: Appointment of Arbitrators | Arbitration Agreement | Arbitration Agreement in Writing | Binding Non Signatory to Arbitration | Chloro Controls | Competence Competence | Competence of Arbitral Tribunal to Rule on its Jurisdiction | Composite Transaction | Construction of Arbitration Agreement | Doctrine of Group of Companies | Existence of Arbitration Agreement | Form of Arbitration Agreement | Formal Validity of Arbitration Agreement | Incorporation | Incorporation by Reference | Incorporation of Arbitration Agreement | Interpretation of Arbitration Agreement | Joinder of Non Signatories | Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal | Kompetenz Kompetenz | MTNL | Necessary Party | Proper Party | Section 11 (6A) ACA | Section 11 ACA | Section 7 (5) ACA | Section 7 ACA | Vidya Drolia | Who Decides Question